UN Refugee Convention, 1951
2022 FEB 19
Preliminary >
International Relations > Agreements > International conventions
Why in news?
- Recently a Private Member’s Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha proposing the enactment of a Refugee and Asylum law.
- The bill triggered discussion about UN Refugee Convention, 1951.
More about the news:
- The Bill lays down comprehensive criteria for recognising asylum seekers and refugees and prescribes specific rights and duties accruing from such status.
- India is neither a signatory to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, nor does it have a domestic asylum framework.
- In the absence of a comprehensive law, refugees are dealt with laws such as:
- Foreigners Act, 1946 and Foreigners Order, 1948
- Registration of Foreigners Act, 1939
- Passports Act (1967)
- Extradition Act, 1962
- Citizenship Act, 1955
About UN Refugee Convention:
- It is a United Nations multilateral treaty that defines who is a refugee, and sets out the rights of individuals who are granted asylum and the responsibilities of nations that grant asylum.
- The grants certain rights to people fleeing persecution because of race, religion, nationality, affiliation to a particular social group, or political opinion.
- As of 2020, there were 146 parties to the Convention. India is not a party to the Convention
- The Convention also sets out which people do not qualify as refugees, such as war criminals. The Convention also provides for some visa-free travel for holders of travel documents issued under the convention.
- The Convention builds on Article 14 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which recognizes the right of persons to seek asylum from persecution in other countries. A refugee may enjoy rights and benefits in a state in addition to those provided for in the Convention
About 1967 Protocol:
- The Convention was initially limited to protecting European refugees before 1951 (after World War II), but states could make a declaration that the provisions would apply to refugees from other places.
- The 1967 Protocol removed the time limits and applied to refugees "without any geographic limitation" but declarations previously made by parties to the Convention on geographic scope were grandfathered
- Today, the 1951 United Nations Convention and the 1967 Protocol together remain the foundation of refugee protection, and their provisions are as relevant now as when they were drafted.
Non-compliance:
- Although the Convention is "legally binding," there is no body that monitors compliance.
- The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has supervisory responsibilities but cannot enforce the Convention, and there is no formal mechanism for individuals to file complaints.
- The Convention specifies that complaints should be referred to the International Court of Justice. It appears that no nation has ever done this.
PRACTICE QUESTION:
With reference to ‘UN Refugee Convention 1951’, consider the following statements:
1. It sets out the rights of individuals who are granted asylum and the responsibilities of nations that grant asylum.
2. India is not a party to the Convention
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Answer